Tunnel Myths & Truths & A Prediction
(16 Myths, 17 Truths and 1 Prediction)
Remember, there is no Tunnel Fairy.
Myth: The sky is falling! Traffic is growing. Traffic from
the third Navy carrier will wreak havoc on our streets.
A tunnel is the only answer.
Truth: The sky is not falling. Coronado traffic has declined
according to the accurate and official numbers at
www.sandag.org. Coronado officials aggressively
supported home-porting of another Navy carrier in
Coronado. A tunnel is definitely not the answer.
Myth: Coronado should "make" the US Navy pay
for construction and maintenance of a tunnel
because military commuters drive through "our town."
All of Coronado's traffic problems are the "fault" of the
US Navy.
Truth: Coronado city has zero jurisdiction and authority
to force the US Navy, which is a part of the
federal government, to do or pay for anything.
Military commuters are entitled to drive over the bridge
and through our town on State Route 75/282
on their way to work on NASNI. Furthermore,
Coronado city does not have the authority to choose
who may drive on SR 75/282 and who may be forced
to drive deep below the surface down into
an unsafe tunnel that concentrates the risk of
nefarious activity against the US Navy, thereby
endangering our entire city population. Coronado's
traffic problems are not the "fault" of the US Navy so
scapegoating the military for all of our traffic woes is
unreasonable and unproductive. Obviously, there
are many other sources of traffic that put cars and
trucks on our streets: employees in local businesses
from Coronado Ferry Landing to the Silver Strand
including three major resort hotels, customers
of those businesses, truck and van deliveries
to those businesses, beach-goers, day trippers,
long-term vacationers, conventioneers, commuters
cutting through our town to South Bay and, last but
not least, our growing resident population due to
intentional increases in residential development
authorized by Coronado city government without
mandatory off-street or other parking restrictions.
Instead of wasting energy and time trying to force
the US Navy to pay for an unsafe and unaffordable
tunnel, Coronado should let the US Navy take care of
its house and Coronado should take care of its own
house. Coronado officials should focus on realistic,
safe and affordable ways to manage traffic within their
jurisdiction -- Park & Ride, Mass Transit (buses, trolleys
and trains), MTS-US Navy Express Bus, San Diego Bay
Commuter Ferry, Casual Carpooling (called "Slugging").
Myth: Someday there will be federal stimulus money to pay
for the construction and maintenance of a tunnel.
Truth: Those who are in the know realize that there will
be no federal stimulus money to construct and maintain a
new tunnel. Stimulus money will go toward fixing old
infrastructure before building new infrastructure. And since
Coronado is not considered a traffic hot spot in our region,
any stimulus money that does come to the San Diego region
will go toward relieving the region's traffic hot spots, not
Coronado's Third & Fourth Street traffic. (See article below
entitled "Top Ten Traffic Hot Spots in San Diego County:
Coronado Is Not On The List.")
Myth: Someday there will be state money to pay for the
construction and maintenance of a tunnel.
Truth: The State of California is in dire economic straits. The
state will never pay for the construction and maintenance
of a tunnel. Coronado will be lucky if the state repays
the money it already took from the general fund. The state
is expected to take more money from Coronado city next year.
Myth: Someday Caltrans (California State Department of
Transportation) will pay for the construction and
maintenance of a tunnel.
Truth: Caltrans will never pay for a tunnel because Coronado
officials plan for it to be a private road, run by a PPP or
"public-private partnership." This means that Coronado
city officials will invite to our town an outside,
for-profit company (most likely foreign, not domestic)
to manage a tunnel for its own profit while
Coronado taxpayers foot the bill for tunnel maintenance
through increased budget expenditures for city public works,
police and fire departments. A tunnel will never become
part of State Route 75/282 so it will never become the
responsibility of Caltrans or any other government agency.
Myth: Someday SANDAG will fund the construction and
maintenance of a tunnel.
Truth: SANDAG stands for the "San Diego Association of
Governments." It is made up of officials from 18 cities and
the county of government of San Diego. San Diego County
and the 17 cities other than Coronado are also experiencing
the bad effects of this current economic recession/depression.
SANDAG has other priorities, for example the top ten
traffic hot spots in our county as explained below on this
website entitled "Top Ten Traffic Hot Spots in San Diego
County: Coronado Is Not On The List." SANDAG will not
allocate taxpayers' money to fund the construction and
maintenance of a Coronado tunnel because the traffic on
Third & Fourth Streets has zero priority in this region.
More Truth: In 1998, through an advisory vote
Coronado voters tasked city council to see if they
could find funding for a bored tunnel. Twelve years
later in 2010, the only thing Coronado voters have
to show for it are vague funding promises from
Coronado officials that are written on wind and
engraved on water. Coronado taxpayers deserve more
than vague promises of federal, state or other forms
of taxpayers' money in unknown amounts materializing
at some unknown date in the future. Remember,
there is no Tunnel Fairy to wave her magic wand
and make tunnel funding appear out of thin air.
Prediction: After Coronado city officials'
vague promises of federal and state government
money prove false, the way that Coronado officials
will try to pay for a tunnel will be through
parcel taxes and big bridge tolls to prop up
risky municipal or other bonds. These bonds
will carry a high risk of default because
the big bridge tolls will keep people off the bridge
and out of Coronado unless they have to
commute over the bridge for work. Then, to avoid
the big bridge tolls, working commuters will
band together and take advantage of the
San Diego Bay Commuter Ferry, Park & Ride,
MTS-US Navy Express Bus Program, Casual Carpooling
(called "Slugging") and Mass Transit (buses, trolleys
and trains). Like the South Bay Expressway
toll road which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and
is in reorganization now due to lack of use by
commuters, the big bridge tolls and
private tunnel road will fail. Bonds will go
into default. To make a bad situation
even worse, the big bridge tolls
will destroy the Coronado small business
community because day trippers and
other tourists will avoid the big bridge tolls
in order to visit other local beach towns that have
authentic character and charm instead. Yes,
a tunnel also will destroy our unique island character
and genuine village charm. A tunnel is a gigantic project
for major urban centers like New York City and Boston.
A tunnel is not right for Coronado.
Myth: A tunnel will run under the San Diego Bay from
San Diego City directly onto Naval Air Station North Island
(NASNI). Thus it will remove traffic from Coronado streets.
Truth: A tunnel will never run under the bay and onto
NASNI because (a) disaster in such a tunnel would disrupt
commerce and military operations in the bay, and
(b) the US Navy will not allow a tunnel onto its property
for obvious security reasons. Instead, a tunnel will run
for less than a mile completely within Coronado city
boundaries. It will start in Coronado at the base of the bridge,
go down down down under Third & Fourth Streets and then
go up up up in the Alameda neighborhood outside the NASNI
gate. A tunnel will add traffic to Coronado streets because
it will increase cut-through vehicle traffic to South Bay.
Also a tunnel simply will add another layer to the vehicle
backup on Third & Fourth Streets during rush hour.
Myth: Commuters will voluntarily drive in a tunnel.
Truth: Commuters will not voluntarily drive in a tunnel.
According to their spokesman, 3,500 contract workers
on North Island military base will not drive in a tunnel
because it is unsafe. Logically, many other commuters
will follow suit and avoid a tunnel because it is unsafe.
Would you chose to be stuck in the confined space of
a tunnel when there is an accident on the bridge or
a car fire in the tunnel? Why would Coronado city
officials expect anyone to voluntarily choose this?
Myth: Commuters can be forced to drive in a tunnel.
Truth: This is the United States of America so Coronado
city officials cannot force drivers into a tunnel against
their will.
Myth: A tunnel will reduce traffic on Third & Fourth Streets.
Truth: Logistically, a tunnel will increase traffic on Third &
Fourth Streets because (a) drivers concerned with their safety
will continue to use Third & Fourth Streets instead of a
tunnel and (b) drivers trying to avoid vehicle backup on the 5
will continue to drive over the bridge and cut through Coronado
on their way to the South Bay area thinking that a tunnel for
other drivers will shorten their own personal commute.
Myth: A tunnel is a reasonable traffic reduction mechanism.
Truth: Logically, a tunnel is unreasonable because it does not
reduce traffic. A tunnel merely accommodates and then
attracts more traffic to Coronado. A tunnel does
absolutely nothing to manage traffic on First Street,
Orange Avenue, the Silver Strand and anywhere else
throughout Coronado Island.
Myth: We must add capacity to fit more vehicles on
our island. Therefore, a tunnel is the only answer.
Truth: We do not need to add capacity for more vehicles on
our island. Our island has a finite amount of space. Only so
many vehicles will fit on our island. We need to reduce the
rate of increase in the number of vehicles on our streets
through affordable and safe ways that are attractive to
commuters, tourists, day trippers and residents. In reality,
the extra traffic lanes of a tunnel will add more bottlenecking
delays to rush hour because there are a fixed number
of lanes on the bridge and on NASNI. If any commuters
can ever be convinced to drive in a tunnel, the only two
things a tunnel will accomplish are: (1) removing the
sight and sound of traffic from Third & Fourth Streets, and
(2) concentrating carbon monoxide in lethal amounts
which will require venting of a tunnel through large,
noisy and unsightly exhaust fans along Third & Fourth
Streets. A tunnel is not the answer. It isn't even close.
Myth: Commuters will never be convinced to get out of
their cars in order to use healthier forms of transportation.
Therefore we need a tunnel.
Truth: As the economy continues to decline further and the
cost of living -- including the price of gas -- continues to
climb higher, commuters can and will be incentivized to
get out of their cars. In fact, now in this dreadful economy
is the perfect time to incentivize cash-strapped drivers
out of their cars and into a healthier lifestyle that allows
them to choose from five of these safe and affordable
traffic management tools: San Diego Bay Commuter Ferry,
Park & Ride, Mass Transit (buses, trolleys, trains),
MTS-US Navy Express Bus and Casual Carpooling
(called "Slugging"). Therefore, we do not need a tunnel.
Myth: A tunnel is safe, or at least as safe as the bridge.
Truth: A tunnel is inherently dangerous because it is planned
to run directly through at least one, and possibly two, active
earthquake fault zones. A tunnel is exponentially more
dangerous than the bridge because it is a magnet for nefarious
activity since the intent for a tunnel is a traffic conduit for
exclusive use by our uniformed service men and women, and
those that support them. It is unreasonable and irresponsible
for any city official to advocate for a tunnel in Coronado because
it is highly dangerous, increases risk of harm and makes everyone
less safe. Remember, there is no Tunnel Fairy to wave her
magic wand and make a tunnel safe for Coronado.
Myth: A tunnel is a good thing because we don't have to
destroy homes.
Truth: A tunnel is a bad thing because we definitely must
destroy homes in three neighborhoods. First, many homes
will be destroyed at the base of the bridge in Coronado near
Third & Fourth Streets. Second, many homes will be destroyed
in the Alameda area outside the Third Street gate to
North Island. Third, many homes will be destroyed along the
surface streets over the tunnel route in order to build large and
noisy tower fans for the purpose of removing concentrated
poisonous carbon exhaust from a tunnel and dispersing it into
the air over Coronado.
Myth: Coronado voted against a cut-and-cover tunnel
in the 1988 advisory ballot measure. Therefore, this type
of tunnel is not included in the decade-long tunnel study
because Coronado city officials respect the will of the voters.