Barbara Denny
Coronado City Councilwoman
Tuesday, May 19, 2009 Special Election

We are working on this website.  Check back later for more.


In the meantime, you can find me at:

  • Facebook - Barbara Denny
  • Twitter - @BarbaraDenny

You're invited to my monthly SPEAK OUT CORONADO community meeting tomorrow Wednesday January 26 from 7 to 8 pm in our public library. Topic: The Economics of the Mills Act for Historic Preservation. This is your chance to meet USD Professor Andrew Narwold and ask about his quantitative research on the Mills Act "halo effect" which enhances city property values and improves the economic picture for local businesses.

Here's A Smart Way to Commute:


Need a Ride? There’s an App for That

Green: Living

Think of all those empty seats in cars headed to school or work in cities around the world. The idea that filling them is a communal good goes back at least to World War II, when the Office of Price Administration put out a poster proclaiming, “When You Ride ALONE You Ride With Hitler!”

National Archives and Records Administration

As carpooling started to wane — the Census Bureau estimates that 11 percent of workers carpool now, down from 23.5 percent in 1980 — other variants emerged.

One was “slugging,” or “casual carpooling,” which involved riders gathering at conveniently located spots and drivers picking up those who are going their way. It has been popular in the Washington and San Francisco Bay areas, which nonetheless rank No. 2 and No. 6 on the most-congested list.

The rise of cellphones and now smartphones has brought a whole new dimension to the process. Piggybacking on the casual-carpool model, Web sites and smartphone apps have been creating virtual gathering spots to match drivers and passengers.

One of the first was NuRide, which was founded in 2002 and went live online in 2005. As Bloomberg Businessweek noted, it has 300 sponsors and nearly 50,000 members in four states and the District of Columbia. Many join through their employers or through a university — SUNY in Orange County, N.Y., participates, as does the University of Virginia. Houston and San Antonio are NuRide cities; a trial is rolling out in Austin.

The lure, aside from a free ride?

“Reward” points that can get both rider and driver discounts on purchases with participating vendors like Chevron or local restaurants or retailers. And the rewards are not just for carpools, but for biking, walking or taking public transportation.

Then came Carticipate, an iPhone and Facebook app that allows drivers and riders to post their route and travel time; no money or rewards involved.

The latest venture is Avego, which is just unrolling its beta test in the Seattle area after talking about a launch for more than two years. It adds a new element — micropayments of 20 cents a mile for a passenger, of which the driver gets 85 percent and the company 15 percent. The driver’s share is topped off at 55 cents, the I.R.S. limit on reimbursement for noncommercial travel. Both driver and rider would have virtual wallets with Avego, which would handle the transfer.

Because of its ability to use G.P.S. coordinates of both riders and drivers, pickups can be arranged with relatively little advance planning; both parties are sent photographs of each other and the rider is given a onetime PIN number which the driver punches in to ensure the right person is climbing in.

With 20 drivers in the Seattle area, Avego has a way to go before it catches up to NuRide’s membership levels; the formal introduction of the Seattle service is planned for later this spring along Route 520, which links downtown Seattle and the University of Washington with Bellevue and Redmond, Microsoft’s base. “We’re trying to create an option for people that will become the best option for people,” said Sean O’Sullivan, the company’s founder.

It will be interesting to watch which model proves more attractive to the casual carpoolers of the future and thus helps most in taking more cars off the road.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Tunnel Tabulator:  Coronado city spent
approximately $14,664,759.53 of taxpayers' money
on
"
the tunnel studies" since 1998.  
On 8 June 2010 nearly 70% of Coronado voters
voted to shut down the tunnel project 
because, 
as they stated and continue to state, 
the city wasted their tax dollars.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
   A Positive New Direction for Coronado
Transportation Policy Update
On Monday 10 January 2011 @ 3pm in
the community center Nautilus room,
we held a successful and productive
special city council meeting wherein we
heard a staff report, heard from ten citizens and
deliberated and set a new transportation policy 
for Coronado.  
We will have a Transportation Commission with
seven members -- 
1 from the Cays, 1 from the Shores, 
3 from the Village & 2 at large members.
At the next regular city council meeting on
1 February 2011 we will
consider adopting an ordinance which 
comprises our new transportation policy.
Kindly contact the Coronado City Clerk's Office
if you are interested in serving on the 
Coronado Transportation Commission.
*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
ANOTHER SUCCESS AT CITY COUNCIL
The item I added to the council agenda
on 7 December 2010 received unanimous support
for a 5-0 vote.  This means that Coronado citizens
will have a cost-effective, comprehensive, thorough,
exclusive, final audit of the tunnel study project 
by a professional, certified third party.  
No such audit
exists yet.  
This is important because Coronado citizens
are still speaking out 
loudly and clearly that  
they want
a final accounting of 
this unique city project through which
approximately $14 million of taxpayers' money
was spent over approximately 12 years.  
Also, in the event that Coronado wants 
to be taken seriously when competing for
federal or other funds for 
transportation
or other projects in the future, 
a final audit is necessary to show
affirmatively and in good faith that 
the Coronado tunnel project was well-managed.
FYI, the purpose of the tunnel audit is
not to find fraud, waste or abuse of public resources.  
The purpose of the tunnel audit is to 
account for the total, twelve-year, 
approximately $14 million tunnel study
project in 
a professional and pro-active manner in order to
to advise the people exactly how much of their
public funds were spent from the beginning of
the tunnel study project to the end of 
the tunnel study project -- which is expected soon --
and what various sources of public funds were spent
on 
the seven tunnel models in the tunnel studies.
This is true for all municipal government audits:
The responsibility to notice and stop 
fraud, waste and abuse of public resources belongs
to the elected city officials and city staff -- not 
the municipal government auditor.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Status Of Unauthorized Boat Landings 
On Coronado Beach

a letter from Barbara Denny, Coronado City Councilwoman
published in the Coronado Eagle & Journal

I read with interest Earle Callahan's letter about the recent unauthorized boat landings on Coronado beach in the 15 December 2010 issue of the Eagle. After communicating directly with Mr. Callahan, I appreciate the opportunity to share some information with Eagle readers now.

As your elected leader, it is my job to protect and provide for Coronado residents, taxpayers and business owners. As you may know, public safety is one of my top priorities. I was very concerned about the approximately five unauthorized boat landings on Coronado beach. So I took action and toured the border with US Border Patrol agents last month on 23 November 2010.

I am pleased to tell you that five (5) days after my border tour, US Border Patrol agents successfully intercepted an unauthorized boat landing on Coronado beach. Nine arrests were made.

This first successful interception of an unauthorized boat landing on Coronado beach on 28 November 2010 is significant for two reasons:

First, it sends the strong message that Coronado protects its citizens from any potential harm from the handlers and others who profit from illegal human trafficking of undocumented persons. These handlers, called “coyotes” by Border Patrol agents, are unscrupulous and consider themselves above the law. It is not unreasonable to suppose that these people can and may do harm to Coronado residents in certain situations, for example where they perceive a direct and immediate threat to their illegal, profit-making activity. Therefore, if you witness an unauthorized boat landing on Coronado beach, you may call the US Border Patrol at 619-278-7033 or 619-628-2921 and make a report of suspicious activity to be followed up on by the proper authorities. Do not approach the situation and you will stay safe.

Second, it sends the strong message to law breakers that Coronado does not enable illegal, for-profit human trafficking of undocumented persons through our town. You may know that those undocumented people who travel to our shore from a variety of other countries around the globe pay a lot of money and are not treated well by their handlers. The lucky undocumented people end up with jobs working for employers who pay them very low wages. These employers, who knowingly employ undocumented persons, suffer no legal or financial consequences. The unlucky undocumented persons who are moved across our border end up in the illegal drug trade or illegal sex trade.

At the council meeting on 7 December 2010, I twice announced the above information about (1) my border tour and (2) the first successful intercept of the unauthorized boat landing in Coronado. The first time I made the announcement was toward the beginning of the meeting during agenda item # 6 Oral Communications (Announcements). The second time I made the announcement was toward the end of the meeting at agenda item # 11A City Council Business (Council Member Reports). You can view portions of that council meeting, or the entire meeting, online at www.coronado.ca.us. Click on “City Council Videos” at the bottom right of the home page.

Kindly know that in addition to updates at city council meetings, I regularly give informational updates on city issues of interest at my monthly Speak Out Coronado community meetings in our public library, on Facebook, on Twitter and on my website at www.barbaratdenny.com.

You are cordially invited to my next monthly Speak Out Coronado community meeting on Wednesday 26 January 2011 in our public library Winn room from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. I look forward to seeing you all there. 

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *  
2010 U.S. CENSUS FIGURES PUBLISHED TODAY
At our council meeting today 21 December 2010 at 3 pm, 
I announced that the initial 2010 federal census results 
were 
published today. 
As of 1 April 2010, the U.S. population rose 9.7% to

308, 745, 538 people.

The population of the State of California

did not significantly change from 2000 to 2010.

More detailed state information is due out 

on 31 December 2010.  

Go to http://2010.census.gov/2010census/.

Mandated every 10 years by

the U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 2,

the federal census is the tool used

to apportion federal resources.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   * 
IN THE NEWS * IN THE NEWS * IN THE NEWS
Coronado is on the map as a
"major California city"
On 14 December 2010 
the San Diego Union-Tribune
published a transportation story about 
the letter that 67 
"elected leaders from 
major California cities and counties" 
signed on and sent to US Senator Barbara Boxer, 
member of the Senate Transportation Committee.
The U-T author writes that 
"Signing the letter from San Diego County were 
council members Barbara Denny of Coronado 
and
Todd Gloria of San Diego."
Our letter calls upon the Senator to push for a 
change in federal transportation policy.
My intent is for the federal government to 
invest 
in
individuals and families by  
supporting smart transportation.
To protect and provide for my constituents, 
I signed on to our letter with the intention to 
secure federal resources for our region -- 
ferry, bus, trolley and train --
to expand our transportation infrastructure, 
improve our economy and 
reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *  *   *   *   *   *   *  
PUBLIC SAFETY * PUBLIC SAFETY * PUBLIC SAFETY
As your elected leader, it is my job to
protect and provide 
for Coronado residents, taxpayers 
and
small business owners.  
As you know, public safety is one of my top priorities.  
I was very concerned about the approximately 
five unauthorized boat landings on Coronado beach.  
So I took action, met with US Border Patrol agents and 
toured the border with them last month on 
23 November 2010.

I am pleased to tell you that five (5) days after 
my border tour, US Border Patrol agents 
successfully intercepted an unauthorized boat landing 
on Coronado beach.  
Nine arrests were made.  

This first successful interception of 
an unauthorized boat landing on Coronado beach 
on 28 November 2010 is 
significant for two reasons: 

First, it sends the strong message that Coronado 
protects its citizens from any potential harm from 
the handlers and others who profit from 
illegal human trafficking of undocumented persons. 

Second, it sends the strong message to law breakers 
that Coronado does not enable the 
illegal,
for-profit 
human trafficking of 
undocumented persons through our town.

 If you witness an unauthorized boat landing 
on Coronado beach, you may call the 
US Border Patrol at 619-278-7033 or 619-628-2921 
and make a report of suspicious activity upon which 
the proper authorities will follow up.  
Do not approach the situation and you will stay safe.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
Thank you to all who participated in my 
SPEAK OUT CORONADO
monthly 
community meeting in November.
We discussed fourteen (14) city topics.
I appreciate your input and value your opinion.
"The most important political office is 
that of the private citizen." 
Former Supreme Court
Associate Justice
Louis Brandeis
*
    *     *     *     *    *     *     *    * 
ANOTHER SUCCESS AT CITY COUNCIL
At the beginning of this year, I added 
a resolution item to our council agenda that earned 
a unanimous 5-0 vote. As did other bay cities, Coronado 
resolved to end the life of the South Bay Power Plant, 
which only supplied overflow power to Los Angeles 
County. Now this old plant is ready for demolition. 
Among other things, this means that bay water quality 
will improve for US Navy SEALs in training and 
recreational water sportsmen.  And property values 
will improve for Coronado Cays homeowners.
Article at San Diego Union-Tribune --
Unneeded South Bay Power Plant OK'd for demolition -
http://signonsandiego.com/news/2010/oct/16/south-bay-power-plant-gets-demolition-ok/

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   * 
California Air Resources Board (CARB)
News Release 
23 October 2010

Councilwoman Barbara Denny's note:
Target greenhouse gas emissions reductions 
per capita for 
San Diego Region are
7% by 2020 and 13% by 2035.
This means the Big Six transportation methods
are crucial in reducing vehicle roundtrips to
Coronado in order to meet our target:
  • Ferry

  • Carpooling

  • Park & Ride

  • MTS Bus

  • Navy Vanpools

  • MTS-Navy Express Bus.
California takes the first step toward more livable, sustainable communities

Regional targets promote more integrated planning, greater transportation choice for Californians

SACRAMENTO - Today California adopted goals for more healthy and sustainable communities that improves the way we plan and promotes more transportation choices.
 
Today the Air Resources Board adopted targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in 2020 and 2035 associated with passenger vehicle travel in the state's 18 Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
 
The proposed targets, required under SB 375 (2008, Steinberg), are designed to help coordinate land use and transportation planning. The law requires cities and counties to use the targets to help develop sustainable strategies for growth and development over the next 25 years. 

Improved planning will offer a wider variety of transportation choices, including public transit and more walkable streets and cities.  It will also guide future development decisions so people can live close to where they work and play.  While the goal is to reduce greenhouse gases from passenger vehicles, it also helps clean the air in the state by reducing the amount of pollution that creates smog.

"These targets are ambitious, achievable and very good news for California communities.  Improved planning means cleaner air in our cities, less time stuck in your car, and healthier, more sustainable communities," said ARB Chairman Mary D. Nichols. "Cities that choose to develop Sustainable Communities Plans that meet these targets have an advantage when it comes to attracting the kinds of vibrant, healthy development that people want."

The targets adopted today were the result of intensive collaboration between ARB and the Metropolitan Planning Organizations, involving strong and consistent input from cities, municipalities and the public.  

Today the Board adopted the following targets. They call for a percent reduction in per-capita emissions by the years 2020 and 2035:
  • The San Diego Area: 7 percent and 13 percent
  • Sacramento Region: 7 percent and 16 percent
  • Bay Area Region: 7 percent and 15 percent
  • Southern California: 8 percent and 13 percent, with the 2035 target conditioned on discussions with the MPO
  • San Joaquin Valley (includes eight planning organizations): placeholder of 5 percent and 10 percent, to be revisited in 2012
  • Targets for the remaining six Metropolitan Planning Organizations—the Monterey Bay, Butte, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Shasta and Tahoe Basin regions—generally match or improve upon their current plans for 2020 and 2035.
In adopting these regional targets, the Board recognized and committed to help identify the funding and resources that are essential tools for regions to move forward successfully towards more sustainable communities.

With the targets now largely in place, the cities within each region will work together with their planning agency to begin developing a Sustainable Community Strategy. Each strategy, designed to accommodate the specific needs and requirements of each region, outlines where growth and development will occur, and how the transportation system can support that growth so that their region's targets can be achieved.  Cities are full partners in this process and retain full local decision making and zoning authority. 

The adoption of the targets today marks a major milestone for the implementation of SB 375, the landmark bill Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law in September 2008. A 21-person advisory committee of experts issued a report in 2009 recommending that the targets be expressed as a percentage reduction of per capita greenhouse gas emissions produced from transportation, using 2005 as the baseline. 

The targets adopted today include forecasts and computer modeling by the planning organizations that reflect a wide variety of strategies, including such things as: shifts towards multi-unit housing closer to a city's center, increasing the number of workers who telecommute and carpool, adding carpool lanes, or increasing the number of people who take public transit.
 
Regions that meet the targets may receive incentives in the form of easier access to federal funding and streamlined environmental review for development projects.
 
For more information on SB 375, see: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/sb375.htm

The Air Resources Board is a department of the California Environmental Protection Agency. ARB's mission is to promote and protect public health, welfare, and ecological resources through effective reduction of air pollutants while recognizing and considering effects on the economy. The ARB oversees all air pollution control efforts in California to attain and maintain health based air quality standards.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Thank you to all the citizens who attended 
another successful monthly
SPEAK OUT CORONADO 
community meeting on 
28 September 2010 
in the Public Library Winn Room.
We discussed traffic and city-wide code enforcement.
Special thanks to the
Naval Base Coronado Community Liaison
for attending and participating by 
supplying information. 
The future looks good for 
realistic traffic management in Coronado.
*   *   *   *  *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *  *   *
Two successes at the 7 September 2010 council meeting:

(1)  As a direct result of another Coronado grass-roots group, 
four council members reversed their earlier position and 
voted with me to stop the study of the voluntary removal 
of Orange Avenue bus stops. The unanimous 5-0 vote 
of council ensures accessible and convenient 
public transportation for our seniors, disabled, 
visually impaired and others.

(2) Two council members joined me to remove 
the federal lobbying firm from the city payroll 
for 
the necessary majority of three votes.  
The vote was three (3) for removal of the lobbyist, 
one (1) to keep the lobbyist on the city payroll, and
one (1) abstained from voting without explanation.

*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *

Thank you to all who attended 
the community meeting on traffic on
Wednesday 8 September 2010.
It was a great meeting with high turnout
and outstanding comments from the public.
I look forward to working hard for you 
to make your ideas a reality
.

                

                


CORONADO REJECTS TUNNEL BY OVER 2:1 MARGIN

PROPOSITION H (Coronado tunnel) FAILS by 67%

On 8 June 2010
Proposition H was defeated with
an undeniably strong vote of the people.

67% of the voters said
NO to a tunnel 
on Coronado Island.

My hat is off to those who voted NO 
in order to stop Coronado from 
wasting more taxpayers' dollars 
on the tunnel project.

Now we can move forward and 
cooperate with our neighbors to
work on realistic, affordable and safe 
traffic management.

Those who voted "yes" 
can take comfort
in the knowledge that 
Coronado CAN and WILL 
manage traffic in
realistic, affordable and safe ways.

Thank you to everyone 
in our grass roots movement who
worked hard on the
ethical, factual, upbeat campaign to
"Kiss the Tunnel Goodbye."




                


A tunnel in Coronado is the problem to all our answers.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Tunnel Myths & Truths & A Prediction 

(16 Myths, 17 Truths and 1 Prediction)

Remember, there is no Tunnel Fairy. 

Myth: The sky is falling!  Traffic is growing.  Traffic from 
the third Navy carrier will wreak havoc on our streets.  
A tunnel is the only answer.

Truth: The sky is not falling.  Coronado traffic has declined 
according to the accurate and official numbers at 
www.sandag.org.  Coronado officials aggressively 
supported home-porting of another Navy carrier in 
Coronado.  A tunnel is definitely not the answer.

Myth:  Coronado should "make" the US Navy pay 
for construction and maintenance of a tunnel 
because military commuters drive through "our town."  
All of Coronado's traffic problems are the "fault" of the 
US Navy.

Truth:  Coronado city has zero jurisdiction and authority
to force the US Navy, which is a part of the 
federal government, to do or pay for anything.  
Military commuters are entitled to drive over the bridge 
and through our town on State Route 75/282 
on their way to work on NASNI.  Furthermore, 
Coronado city does not have the authority to choose 
who may drive on SR 75/282 and who may be forced 
to drive deep below the surface down into 
an unsafe tunnel that concentrates the risk of 
nefarious activity against the US Navy, thereby 
endangering our entire city population.  Coronado's
traffic problems are not the "fault" of the US Navy so
scapegoating the military for all of our traffic woes is
unreasonable and unproductive.  Obviously, there 
are many other sources of traffic that put cars and 
trucks on our streets: employees in local businesses 
from Coronado Ferry Landing to the Silver Strand 
including three major resort hotels, customers 
of those businesses, truck and van deliveries 
to those businesses, beach-goers, day trippers, 
long-term vacationers, conventioneers, commuters
cutting through our town to South Bay and, last but
not least, our growing resident population due to 
intentional increases in residential development 
authorized by Coronado city government without 
mandatory off-street or other parking restrictions.  
Instead of wasting energy and time trying to force 
the US Navy to pay for an unsafe and unaffordable
tunnel, Coronado should let the US Navy take care of
its house and Coronado should take care of its own
house.  Coronado officials should focus on realistic, 
safe and affordable ways to manage traffic within their
jurisdiction -- Park & Ride, Mass Transit (buses, trolleys
and trains), MTS-US Navy Express Bus, San Diego Bay
Commuter Ferry, Casual Carpooling (called "Slugging").

Myth: Someday there will be federal stimulus money to pay 
for the construction and maintenance of a tunnel.

Truth: Those who are in the know realize that there will 
be no federal stimulus money to construct and maintain a 
new tunnel.  Stimulus money will go toward fixing old 
infrastructure before building new infrastructure.  And since 
Coronado is not considered a traffic hot spot in our region,
any stimulus money that does come to the San Diego region 
will go toward relieving the region's traffic hot spots, not 
Coronado's Third & Fourth Street traffic.  (See article below
entitled "Top Ten Traffic Hot Spots in San Diego County: 
Coronado Is Not On The List.")

Myth:  Someday there will be state money to pay for the 
construction and maintenance of a tunnel.

Truth:  The State of California is in dire economic straits.  The
state will never pay for the construction and maintenance 
of a tunnel.  Coronado will be lucky if the state repays 
the money it already took from the general fund.  The state 
is expected to take more money from Coronado city next year.

Myth: Someday Caltrans (California State Department of
Transportation) will pay for the construction and 
maintenance of a tunnel.

Truth:  Caltrans will never pay for a tunnel because Coronado 
officials plan for it to be a private road, run by a PPP or 
"public-private partnership."  This means that Coronado 
city officials will invite to our town an outside, 
for-profit company (most likely foreign, not domestic) 
to manage a tunnel for its own profit while 
Coronado taxpayers foot the bill for tunnel maintenance 
through increased budget expenditures for city public works, 
police and fire departments.  A tunnel will never become 
part of State Route 75/282 so it will never become the 
responsibility of Caltrans or any other government agency.

Myth:  Someday SANDAG will fund the construction and 
maintenance of a tunnel.

Truth:  SANDAG stands for the "San Diego Association of 
Governments."  It is made up of officials from 18 cities and
the county of government of San Diego.  San Diego County
and the 17 cities other than Coronado are also experiencing 
the bad effects of this current economic recession/depression.  
SANDAG has other priorities, for example the top ten 
traffic hot spots in our county as explained below on this 
website entitled "Top Ten Traffic Hot Spots in San Diego 
County: Coronado Is Not On The List."  SANDAG will not 
allocate taxpayers' money to fund the construction and 
maintenance of a Coronado tunnel because the traffic on
Third & Fourth Streets has zero priority in this region.

More Truth:  In 1998, through an advisory vote 
Coronado voters tasked city council to see if they 
could find funding for a bored tunnel.  Twelve years
later in 2010, the only thing Coronado voters have 
to show for it are vague funding promises from 
Coronado officials that are written on wind and 
engraved on water.  Coronado taxpayers deserve more 
than vague promises of federal, state or other forms 
of taxpayers' money in unknown amounts materializing 
at some unknown date in the future.  Remember, 
there is no Tunnel Fairy to wave her magic wand 
and make tunnel funding appear out of thin air.

Prediction:  After Coronado city officials' 
vague promises of federal and state government 
money prove false, the way that Coronado officials
will try to pay for a tunnel will be through  
parcel taxes and big bridge tolls to prop up
risky municipal or other bonds.  These bonds 
will carry a high risk of default because 
the big bridge tolls will keep people off the bridge 
and out of Coronado unless they have to 
commute over the bridge for work.  Then, to avoid 
the big bridge tolls, working commuters will 
band together and take advantage of the 
San Diego Bay Commuter Ferry, Park & Ride, 
MTS-US Navy Express Bus Program, Casual Carpooling 
(called "Slugging") and Mass Transit (buses, trolleys
and trains).  Like the South Bay Expressway 
toll road which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and
is in reorganization now due to lack of use by 
commuters, the big bridge tolls and 
private tunnel road will fail.  Bonds will go 
into default.  To make a bad situation 
even worse, the big bridge tolls 
will destroy the Coronado small business 
community because day trippers and 
other tourists will avoid the big bridge tolls 
in order to visit other local beach towns that have 
authentic character and charm instead.  Yes, 
a tunnel also will destroy our unique island character 
and genuine village charm.  A tunnel is a gigantic project 
for major urban centers like New York City and Boston.  
A tunnel is not right for Coronado.  

Myth:  A tunnel will run under the San Diego Bay from 
San Diego City directly onto Naval Air Station North Island
(NASNI).  Thus it will remove traffic from Coronado streets.

Truth:  tunnel will never run under the bay and onto
NASNI because (a) disaster in such a tunnel would disrupt
commerce and military operations in the bay, and 
(b) the US Navy will not allow a tunnel onto its property
for obvious security reasons.  Instead, a tunnel will run 
for less than a mile completely within Coronado city 
boundaries.  It will start in Coronado at the base of the bridge, 
go down down down under Third & Fourth Streets and then 
go up up up in the Alameda neighborhood outside the NASNI 
gate.  A tunnel will add traffic to Coronado streets because 
it will increase cut-through vehicle traffic to South Bay.  
Also a tunnel simply will add another layer to the vehicle 
backup on Third & Fourth Streets during rush hour

Myth:  Commuters will voluntarily drive in a tunnel.

Truth:  Commuters will not voluntarily drive in a tunnel.
According to their spokesman, 3,500 contract workers 
on North Island military base will not drive in a tunnel 
because it is unsafe.  Logically, many other commuters 
will follow suit and avoid a tunnel because it is unsafe.  
Would you chose to be stuck in the confined space of 
a tunnel when there is an accident on the bridge or 
a car fire in the tunnel?  Why would Coronado city 
officials expect anyone to voluntarily choose this?

Myth:  Commuters can be forced to drive in a tunnel.

Truth:  This is the United States of America so Coronado 
city officials cannot force drivers into a tunnel against 
their will.

Myth:  A tunnel will reduce traffic on Third & Fourth Streets.

Truth Logistically, a tunnel will increase traffic on Third & 
Fourth Streets because (a) drivers concerned with their safety 
will continue to use Third & Fourth Streets instead of a 
tunnel and (b) drivers trying to avoid vehicle backup on the 5 
will continue to drive over the bridge and cut through Coronado 
on their way to the South Bay area thinking that a tunnel for 
other drivers will shorten their own personal commute. 

Myth: A tunnel is a reasonable traffic reduction mechanism.

Truth:  Logically, a tunnel is unreasonable because it does not
reduce traffic.  A tunnel merely accommodates and then 
attracts more traffic to Coronado.  A tunnel does 
absolutely nothing to manage traffic on First Street, 
Orange Avenue, the Silver Strand and anywhere else 
throughout Coronado Island.  

Myth:  We must add capacity to fit more vehicles on 
our island.  Therefore, a tunnel is the only answer.

Truth:  We do not need to add capacity for more vehicles on
our island.  Our island has a finite amount of space.  Only so 
many vehicles will fit on our island.  We need to reduce the 
rate of increase in the number of vehicles on our streets 
through affordable and safe ways that are attractive to 
commuters, tourists, day trippers and residents.  In reality, 
the extra traffic lanes of a tunnel will add more bottlenecking 
delays to rush hour because there are a fixed number 
of lanes on the bridge and on NASNI.  If any commuters
can ever be convinced to drive in a tunnel, the only two
things a tunnel will accomplish are: (1) removing the 
sight and sound of traffic from Third & Fourth Streets, and 
(2) concentrating carbon monoxide in lethal amounts 
which will require venting of a tunnel through large, 
noisy and unsightly exhaust fans along Third & Fourth 
Streets.  A tunnel is not the answer.  It isn't even close.

Myth:  Commuters will never be convinced to get out of 
their cars in order to use healthier forms of transportation.  
Therefore we need a tunnel.  

Truth:  As the economy continues to decline further and the 
cost of living -- including the price of gas -- continues to 
climb higher, commuters can and will be incentivized to 
get out of their cars.  In fact, now in this dreadful economy 
is the perfect time to incentivize cash-strapped drivers 
out of their cars and into a healthier lifestyle that allows 
them to choose from five of these safe and affordable 
traffic management tools:  San Diego Bay Commuter Ferry, 
Park & Ride, Mass Transit (buses, trolleys, trains), 
MTS-US Navy Express Bus and Casual Carpooling 
(called "Slugging").  Therefore, we do not need a tunnel.

Myth:  A tunnel is safe, or at least as safe as the bridge.

Truth:  A tunnel is inherently dangerous because it is planned 
to run directly through at least one, and possibly two, active 
earthquake fault zones.  A tunnel is exponentially more 
dangerous than the bridge because it is a magnet for nefarious 
activity since the intent for a tunnel is a traffic conduit for 
exclusive use by our uniformed service men and women, and 
those that support them.  It is unreasonable and irresponsible 
for any city official to advocate for a tunnel in Coronado because 
it is highly dangerousincreases risk of harm and makes everyone 
less safe.  Remember, there is no Tunnel Fairy to wave her 
magic wand and make a tunnel safe for Coronado.

Myth:  A tunnel is a good thing because we don't have to 
destroy homes.

Truth: A tunnel is a bad thing because we definitely must 
destroy homes in three neighborhoods.  First, many homes 
will be destroyed at the base of the bridge in Coronado near 
Third & Fourth Streets.  Second, many homes will be destroyed 
in the Alameda area outside the Third Street gate to 
North Island.  Third, many homes will be destroyed along the 
surface streets over the tunnel route in order to build large and 
noisy tower fans for the purpose of removing concentrated 
poisonous carbon exhaust from a tunnel and dispersing it into 
the air over Coronado.

Myth: Coronado voted against a cut-and-cover tunnel 
in the 1988 advisory ballot measure.  Therefore, this type 
of tunnel is not included in the decade-long tunnel study 
because Coronado city officials respect the will of the voters.  

Truth:  The cut-and-cover tunnel is most definitely 
on the table and included in the decade-long 
tunnel study, which is against the will of 
Coronado voters.  

Myth:  A tunnel will improve property values 
for homes in the vicinity of Third & Fourth Streets.

Truth:  A tunnel will dramatically reduce property values 
for homes in the vicinity of Third & Fourth Streets around
"A" to "J" Avenues, depending on the number and location 
of the homes that are destroyed to accommodate 
the two tunnel portals (the points where each end of a
tunnel "daylights" up onto surface streets from 
down below Third & Fourth Streets).  Tunnel construction 
is in very risky because according to engineers it is likely to 
destabilize the foundations of some homes that remain 
on the surface streets around and near a tunnel 
construction site.  Also, homeowners whose residences 
remain over and near a constructed tunnel will experience 
a concentrated shower of poisonous carbon monoxide 
(vehicle exhaust) from noisy and unsightly towering 
exhaust fans along Third & Fourth Streets, as well as 
the regular shaking and trembling of their houses 
that they will feel due to any car and truck traffic that 
may be convinced to use a tunnel.  In the event of 
an earthquake in the active Coronado Fault 
through which a tunnel will be constructed, 
resulting property damage to area homes will be 
magnified due to the existence of a tunnel underneath.   
All of these things will dramatically reduce the 
property values of those remaining homes in 
the vicinity of a tunnel, which will run under 
Third & Fourth Streets from the base of the bridge 
in Coronado to Alameda Avenue outside the NASNI gate.  
A tunnel will never daylight on the military base because 
for obvious security reasons the federal government 
cannot allow a tunnel portal to exist on its property.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 
A tunnel in Coronado is the problem to all our answers.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

IF NOT THE TUNNEL, 
THEN HOW DO WE MANAGE TRAFFIC ?

Here are four transportation mechanisms that together will reduce traffic over the bridge and onto our island.  In this way, we will manage our island-wide traffic problem including, but not limited to, the traffic problem on Third & Fourth Streets.  

In line with the principles of good government, Councilwoman Barbara Denny has been working very hard on these four transportation mechanisms for quite some time and will continue to do so because they are affordable, safe and supported by local, regional, state and federal officials.  

Due to widespread support, together these four mechanisms have the best realistic chance for success:

(1) Park & Ride - Championed consistently and publicly by Councilwoman Barbara Denny for over a year and a half, this is favored in our region and will be an important part of SANDAG's Regional Transportation Plan 2011 because it will reduce our carbon footprint by reducing the number of commuting cars that emit carbon.  Councilwoman Denny is the leader on ensuring that Coronado benefits from Park & Ride. Councilwoman Denny has also been working hard and building alliances successfully with elected officials and others over the bridge in order to facilitate Park & Ride to benefit Coronado by alleviating traffic over the bridge.  (Supported locally by SANDAG, the San Diego Association of local Governments)

(2) San Diego Bay Commuter Ferry - Championed consistently and publicly by Councilwoman Barbara Denny for about twelve years, this service currently reduces more than 10,000 car trips per month over the bridge.  Councilwoman Denny has been and will continue to work closely with ferry operator San Diego Harbor Excursions and others to increase commuter ferry ridership in order to reduce even more car trips over the bridge.  

By way of background, Councilwoman Denny saved the commuter ferry from defunding by local officials when she was a ferry commuter working as a Child Support Enforcement Attorney at the San Diego District Attorney's Office.  Denny drafted a petition and walked all over the island from the Village to the Cays with volunteers to gather signatures to save the ferry.  Denny amassed so many signatures that State Senator Dede Alpert sponsored two bills that funded the commuter ferry ad infinitum because, as the legislation states, the ferry is a "vital link in our regional transportation infrastructure" that needs protection from "unnecessary bureaucratic meddling" in order to keep it strong and build it up.  (Supported by the State of California)

(3) MTS-Navy Express Bus Pilot Program - Championed consistently and publicly by Councilwoman Barbara Denny for over a year and a half, this is an arrangement between San Diego MTS and the US Navy wherein targeted areas with a high population of military base workers, starting with Murphy Canyon, will use MTS buses to make express runs to area military bases.  This program is in its infancy.  The success of this program will lead to its expansion over time and increased reduction of car trips over the bridge.  (Supported regionally by MTS & federally by the US Navy)

(4) Casual Carpooling - Championed consistently and publicly by Councilwoman Denny for less than a year, casual carpooling has been around since 1975 in the United States. Informally called "slugging," it works successfully in Washington, DC, in the Pentagon and in the Bay Area of San Francisco.  It operates entirely without government intervention.  Councilwoman Denny introduced slugging to our regional transportation discussion in her commuter ferry article published in the San Diego Union-Tribune on Sunday 21 February 2010.  A copy of this article is below for you to read.  (To be supported by the public / no government intervention by definition)

If you have other ideas you would like to discuss, kindly go to the "Contact Us" page of this website and send an email.  Councilwoman Denny would like to hear about all other affordable, safe and reasonably supportable ways to reduce car trips over the bridge and onto our island.  In this way we will manage our island-wide traffic problem, including the traffic problem on Third & Fourth Streets.  

*****************************************
Community Essay: Coronado
Commuter Ferry Deserves Support

By Barbara Denny

Published Sunday 21 February 2010 in the 
San Diego Union-Tribune

As the San Diego Union-Tribune has reported, the commuter ferry service between San Diego’s Broadway Pier and North Island Naval Air Station has been discontinued by military command. I support this decision because the security of the men and women who put themselves in harm’s way for us, and those who support them, is crucial.

But commuter ferry service from Broadway Pier to Coronado’s Ferry Landing remains in operation. In addition to non-base-bound travelers, this service currently accommodates approximately 175 base-bound ferry commuters resulting in a reduction of up to 9,000 car trips per month. As reported by the Union-Tribune, some base-bound ferry commuters travel on their own through Coronado to North Island on bicycles and electric scooters.

However, in order to facilitate movement of the un-wheeled, base-bound commuters from Coronado Ferry Landing to North Island, Coronado city staff and Navy staff are working to determine the source of funding for a shuttle bus.

Now the discontinuation of the North Island ferry stop results in a savings of variable costs in the contract between the City of Coronado and the commuter ferry operator, San Diego Harbor Excursions.  An example of a variable cost is gasoline. 

At issue is the future use of these contract savings.

While some have suggested that these contract savings may fund overland transportation of base-bound commuter ferry riders by shuttle bus from Coronado Ferry Landing to North Island, it is possible that the legislation that controls the commuter ferry funding precludes such use of funds.

The ferry legislation sponsored by former Democratic state Senator Dede Alpert a decade ago secured funding specifically for the San Diego Bay commuter ferry service ad infinitum, which means forever. The stated purpose of these bills is to prevent “unnecessary bureaucratic meddling” with the commuter ferry in order to protect and keep it strong because the commuter ferry is a vital part of our regional transportation infrastructure.

The legality of using the commuter ferry contract savings for overland shuttle bus transportation is questionable. That is why Coronado city staff and Navy staff are reviewing the language and legislative intent of SBs 664 and 1433 to determine how best to provide overland transportation for Navy ferry riders.

While this overland transportation is a key part of maintaining and growing military ferry ridership, funds intended specifically for the commuter ferry service most likely cannot be diverted to another use, such as a shuttle bus. Instead, the commuter ferry contract savings must be put back into commuter ferry service by increasing the number of commuter runs across the bay.

In keeping with the purpose and intent of the commuter ferry legislation, San Diego Harbor Excursions has plans for additional morning and evening commuter runs between the Coronado Ferry Landing and Broadway Pier which equal the contract savings. This facilitates the growth of overall commuter ferry ridership.

As a result, all efforts must be made to find alternative funding for a shuttle bus in order to ensure that un-wheeled, base-bound commuters continue to ride the ferry. Or, an alternative to the shuttle bus is necessary. The best alternative is the low-cost option of casual carpooling in which North Island-bound drivers stop at the Coronado Ferry Landing, pick up ferry riders, and drive to the base for work. If necessary, appropriate incentives can be offered to the drivers.

Casual carpooling has been in existence in the United States since 1975. Currently, the Pentagon, the District of Columbia and San Francisco have successful casual carpooling systems which operate entirely without government intervention. This phenomenon is called “slugging.” I encourage all large employers in the San Diego region to look to slugging as a way to reduce car trips.

San Diego County is a world-class region in which to live and work. Therefore, all of us – including military commuters – deserve a world-class transportation infrastructure. The fact is that the commuter ferry is a vital link in our regional transportation infrastructure. I am confident that all North Island-bound ferry commuters will be properly accommodated.

As we look for ways to reduce our carbon footprint, the San Diego Bay commuter ferry service must be supported so that it can reach its full potential of reducing car trips over the bridge.

Denny is a Coronado City Councilwoman and an attorney experienced in land use, water law and defense litigation.

***********************************

A tunnel in Coronado is the problem to all our answers.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

TOP TEN TRAFFIC HOT SPOTS 

IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY 

Coronado is not on the list

 

The fact is that Coronado's Third & Fourth Streets did not

make San Diego County's list of top ten troublesome traffic

hot spots.

 

The San Diego Union-Tribune ran articles on 9 February 2010

and 14 March 2010 focusing on the worst traffic in the county.

Go to www.signonsandiego.com and search "Worst Rush Hour

Spot in County Goes To . . ." and "Battling a Bottleneck in

San Marcos" for more information.

 

Logically then, it is impractical and unrealistic to count on 

federal stimulus or other government agency money 

materializing anytime in the future for a tunnel in 

Coronado. Our traffic problems simply pale in 

comparison to other places in San Diego County.

This is a fact of life.  

 

All of the worst rush hour spots are far north of Coronado.

 

They are in North San Diego City, Del Mar, Solana Beach, 

Escondido and San Marcos:

 

 1) State Route 78 at Barham Drive (Eastbound, afternoon)

 2) Interstate 15 at Citracado Parkway (Northbound, afternoon)

 3) Interstate 805 at Nobel Drive (Southbound, afternoon)

 4) Interstate 805 at Clairemont Mesa Blvd. (Northbound, morning)

 5) State Route 52 near Mast Blvd. (Eastbound, afternoon)

 6) Interstate 805 at Sorrento Valley Road (Southbound, afternoon)

 7) Interstate 5 at Via de la Valle (Northbound, afternoon)

 8) Interstate 15 at Miramar Way (Northbound, afternoon)

 9) Interstate 5 at Lomas Santa Fe Drive  (Northbound, afternoon)

10) State Route 78 at Broadway/Lincoln Pkwy. (Westbound, morning).

 

Even though our traffic problems didn't make the list of

San Diego regions's worst traffic spots, they are still problems 

for us.  

 

So, I am working hard on realistic, affordable and safe ways 

to manage traffic in Coronado, including Third & Fourth

Streets.  These five mechanisms already have strong support 

from local, state and federal government officials and 

agencies.  Therefore, together they have the best 

realistic chance of success in managing Coronado traffic: 

Park & Ride, Casual Carpooling (called "Slugging"), 

Mass Transit, MTS-US Navy Express Bus Program,

San Diego Bay Commuter Ferry.


Welcome to the 
Barbara Denny 
Coronado City Councilwoman 
Website

 

 

 


Thank you for your support.  


I am working hard for all of Coronado 
on City Council.


I continue to walk door-to-door throughout our island community to listen to what's on your mind.  


My goal is to keep my finger on the pulse of Coronado so that I may continue to vote confidently in your best interests as you expect me to do.